Older Blogs: 2007-2010 http://www.tigersoft.com/Tiger-Blogs/index.htm
by William Schmidt, Ph.D. (Columbia University and Tiger Software)
www.tigersoftware.com and www.tigersoft.com
Author of Tiger Insider Stock Trading Software. Peerless Stock Market Timing: 1915-2013
Explosive Super Stocks Killer Short Sales Tiger Tahiti System Tiger Closing Power
NEW Detecting and Profiting Pump and Dump Schemes: 2013-2014 ARWR
Other links: Jobs Report
10/29/2011 Fond Memories of My Brother Baldwin Stephen Schmidt
"For historians ought to be precise, truthful, and quite unprejudiced, and neither interest nor fear,
hatred nor affection, should cause them to swerve from the path of truth, whose mother is history,
the rival of time, the depository of great actions, the witness of what is past, the example and instruction
of the present, the monitor of the future. " Miguel de Cervantes Don Quixote
American Pothole Humor
Republican condemnation of Public Spending except on the military
has reached ridiculous levels. It was not this way in 1925 or 1955
when Republican Presidents launched massive national highway
programs. Why do the Democrats not fight back? Why does the
President not make the neglected infrastructure a much bigger issue?
He and Hilary are too busy starting a new cold war with Russia and
finding new ways to snoop on Americans who might disagree with
or blow the whistle on his paranoid "national security" programs.
OBAMA boasts - "Russia Doesn't Make Anything".
Unmindful of how foolish, how arrogant, how childish and how unnecessarily
provocative his words seem to millions of Russians, Obama told the London Economist that
Russia "doesn't make anything". He thereby implied that Russia can easily be
brought to heel by united Europeon and American trade sanctions. Talk like his
is wantonly incendiary
To make his point, he added: "Immigrants aren't rushing to Moscow....
The life expectancy of the Russian male is around 60 years... (and) the
population is shrinking," Obama is deluded. His data is out of date.
It refers to the era of the rich oligarchs under Yeltsin.
Fact: Russia has strong, net positive migration:
Russia experiences a constant flow of immigration. On average, close
to 300,000 legal immigrants enter the country every year; about half are
ethnic Russians from the other republics of the former Soviet Union. There
is a significant inflow of ethnic Armenians, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz and Tajiks
into big Russian cities, something that is viewed unfavorably by some citizens.
In addition, there are an estimated 4 million illegal immigrants from the ex-Soviet
states in Russia.
Fact: Over the last decade life expectancy in Russia has significantly increased:
Russia - Life expectancy at birth
Date Life expectancy Life expectancy - Men Life expectancy - Women 2012 70.46 64.90 76.30 2011 69.66 64.00 75.60 2010 68.86 63.10 74.90 2009 68.70 62.80 74.70 2008 67.90 61.80 74.20 2007 67.50 61.40 73.90 2006 66.60 60.40 73.20
Fact: Russian Population is now rising
But why would our President speak so categorically of a whole nation?
Why would he express such conempt for the productive power and creativity of
150 million Russians? Why did he go out of his way to try to hurt their pride?
Why would the President of the United States want to insult the people of any
nation, especially one with nuclear weapons, submarines and inter-continental
missiles? Is he crazy? What possible reason could he have to allientate a
still, very powerful nation.
We should be working with the Russians to curb terrorism, to control Syria and to
contain the tide of Islamic Jihadism. What's wrong with Obama? Is he crazy?
What's wrong with being polite and diplomatic? Why be so provocative?
He and Clinton and Kerry all seem to want a truly stupid, new Cold War
in order to justify to the American taxpayer the spending $700 billion a year
on still more weapons. Sure, this trio of "corporate liberals"are simply
puppets of Lockheed, Boeing, General Dynamics and Wall Street... With
the winding down of the war in Afghanistan, they figure that a new war must
quickly be started or the American people will start to question why we
need to spend as much as the next 10 largest countries do on their militaries.
But I think there more to the story. Obama's words are so ridiculous
and so hypocritical, he is acting very much like a crazy person. He utterly
forgets how little America itself now makes. Try buying an American hammer
at Home Depot! Most everything there is stamped "made in China".
Try buying an America-made shirt or pair of pants. And when Americans
want to go into space now, they must use Russian rockets and the Russian
Space Station. Russian makes very deadly missiles, MIGs and tanks. Each
one of them, America must match at great expense.
So, why insult all Russians? It just makes Obama and his whole Administration
seem utterly childish, petty, provocative and STUPID. That he does not
see how absurd he sounds, surely shows how much the stress of the job has
gotten to him. Many have remarked how his hair is rapidly turning white.
He looks much older than he did just two years ago. More important, listen
to him talk. Each time he speaks about a substantive issue, he sounds like
he did in his first campaign debate with Romney. Have you noticed that
he no longer holds news conferences? He finds it harder and harder to express
himself cogently, clearly and relevantly on complicated subjects. Worse?
When he talks about Russia, he seems delusional. The Crimea and South-Eastern
Ukraine have been Russian since the 1780s. If the Russians living there want to
join Russia, what business is it of ours?
Worse still? he absolutely disprespects the millions who voted for him. His
latest words make a mockery of his campaign pledge to use diplomacy to
heighten international understanding and promote good will. Like an uneducated
dunce, he tosses out blanket pejoratives and national stereoypes and abandons
his campaign promise to have meetings and conversations with all foreign leaders
to find solutions to mutual problems before they become crises.
7/28/2014 OBAMA SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!
But not for the frivolous reasons the Republicans give!
Obama has just stabbed in the back the millions who voted for
him thinking he would honor his pledge to protect the Eastern
Seaboard against Oil Exploration and Drilling. What's worse?
Last week his Administration announced that the Atlantic Coast is
open now to Oil/Gas Exploration using horrific new sound-blasting
technologies to explore and map possible deep-water oil deposits.
The oil/gas industry calls them "sonic canons". Towed behind a boat,
they send out sound waves 100-1000 times more deafening then jet engines
every 10 seconds. The Administration even admits that this is a death
sentence to large populations of whales, dolphins and sea turtles...
It reckons that "only" 140,000 whales and dolphins will be harmed.
First the whales and dolphins will be made deaf. Imagine their terror
and pain. Then in great agony, they will die.
Whales and dolphin depend upon hearing to communicate and
to find food. Obama has willfully sentenced them to an excruciating
Death. They are highly sentient beings. They are vital to
the whole ocean's health. As humans, we should be stewards,
not cruel destroyers of Nature and Wild Life.
Did he really think that we would not notice this decision? Or does
he just not care how betrayed we fell? How much did they pay him?
Does he not remember ridiculing the "Drill Baby, Drill" crowd? Has he
no shame? What will he do next? Allow more nuclear reactors to
be built on active fault lines? I shudder to consider by what calculus
he now makes decisions. Perhaps, he is going insane. How else
can we explain this wanton and unexplained cruelty? An Administration
capable of such cruelty to dolphins and whales is an Administration
that could also cruelly and violently turn on its own citizens! The
Republicans are right. Obama is too dangerous to be President.
He has betrayed all the Democrats who do stand for something.
Clearly he does not! Why should the general public now ever believe
a Democrat again? He clearly is a smug, arrogant, socio-pathic
pretender. And what about all the minorities who were so proud of him.
How confused and betrayed they, too, will feel when they learn of his
cruel new anti-environment and anti-wildlife policies. How terribly he
has let us all down! And why has the mainstream corporate media been so
quiet about this betrayal of those who would protect defenseless wild-life?
This is easily the single greatest act of political perfidy I can
recall as an adult. What will be the reaction of the youth? idealistic
young people that supported Obama in his campaigns will surely
feel crushed. Their first reaction will probably be despair. Some will
opt out and not participate in the political process for a long time.
But I hope others will feel outrage and anger. These energies can be
positively re-directed. My suggestion. Get even! Make him pay for
this terrible betrayal. Deny him the Presidency.
Join Greenpeace and help them fight Obama's willful killing of
whales and dolpins.
now to stop this Murder of Dolphins and Whales.
More to read:
Underwater Whale Sounds - Full 60 Minute Ambient Soundscape
Sentient and sapient whales and dolphins - WDC
Whales closer to us than thought News in Science
Whales and dolphins 'should have legal rights' - The Guardian
Why The FED's Task Is So Difficult Now.
Central now in seeking to understand the Fed, the stock market
and the US economy is to appreciate how pre-eminently powerful
are the Big Banks on Wall Street. There can be little doubt about
this now. The camouflage is gone. The smoke and mirrors have
been taken away. They run Washington and, both Republican and
1) When the 2008 bailout of big banks occurred, it seemed to me
that the US politicians were openly admiting and confirming
the theoretical correctness the Marxists who claimed high finance
ran everything, including Washington. There was no free market
place for them. They got trillions. There was the emergency
$800 Billion. And the Fed loaned trillions to the banks in return
for the worthless mortgages they had written.
2) Later Congress, President Obama, the Fed and the SEC
all refused to strictly regulate derivative financial instruments despite
their role in the Crash of 2008.
3) The big banks that were to big too fail have gotten much,
much bigger under Obama. They were not broken up. They
were not made to decide whether they wanted to be brokerages
or public banks.
4) The Public's Deposits are now in more jeopardy than
even because of the way the FED has financed the post 2008
big bank securities', bonds' and derivatives' speculation as the
Fed bought their long-term mortgages.
5) Surprise. surprise. No big banker went to jail despite their
blatant fraud and insider trading. Obama's Eric Holder openly
achnowledges that the biggest bankers are above the law.
Pursuing criminal charges against any of the biggest bankers
would hurt investor confidence too much, he says.
6) So the rich on Wall Street have gotten much richer and
the poor much more numerous. This is exactly what Wall
Street's Elite wants.
Is it any surprise then that the US Economy suffers now from a
huge UNDER-CONSUMPTION PROBLEM. Demand in the US
is nowhere near big great enough to satisfy Wall Street's quest
for markets and big profits. American workers are just not paid
enough to buy what corporations want.
The FED knows all this, but they can do nothing about it. And if they
could do something, Wall Street would probably not let them.
The only solutions are Public Works, Tariffs, Taxes on the Wealthy
and a great Re-Distribution of Wealth from the 1% to the 99%.
90 years ago the English economist John Hobson warned
how underconsumption borne of wealth inequality was the
leading factor causing Depressions, financial busts and
Wars of Imperialsim. His ideas influenced a great many famous
followers, from Keynes to VI Lenin. To learn more read here.
"When productive capacity grew faster than consumer demand, there was
very soon an excess of this capacity (relative to consumer demand), and,
hence, there were few profitable domestic investment outlets. Foreign
investment was the only answer. But, insofar as the same problem existed
in every industrialized capitalist country, such foreign investment was
possible only if non-capitalist countries could be civilized, Christianized
and uplifted that is, if their traditional institutions could be forcefully
destroyed, and the people coercively brought under the domain of the
invisible hand of market capitalism. So, imperialism was the only answer."
Based on Hobson's ideas and also how the same big Bankers
cynically financed both the Central Powers and the Allied sides,
Lenin wrote that the most advanced stage of capitalism was
when the Capitalism was run by monopoly finance capital.
While I'm no Leninist-revolutionary elitist, this idea does seem
to describe who is at the top of the capitalist hierarchy now.
I can't imagine the Mainstream Media talking about all these
factors and the unbridled power of Wall Street, too.
But the FED knows about them and they know who they really
must answer to. So somehow they are expected to prevent
another financial panic, avoid a stock market bubble still make
the Wall Street moguls happy. This is not going to be easy.
For one thing, Wall Street has created lots of hugely profitable
leveraged derivatives. But if a down-market comes, they make it
much easier than it was even in 2008 for momentum investors to
switch quickly and forcefully into very big and very leveraged
short positions without the need to wait for an up-tick or borrow
stock. This is very dangerous. The speed of the next bear market
will probably be much greater than in 2008.
The depth of the decline could be much worse, too, since the 2009-
2014 economic recovery seems woefully inadequate for most
Americans. Suddenly if the rich drastically cut back their
discretetionary spending in the next Financial Panic (which is
exactly what should be expected) and the Federal Government
does not pursue compensatory massive public works' programs
(because the House of Representatives is held by conservative
Republicans), there will massive Under-Consumption problem.
So, the FED's challenge now is also how to avoid a financial crash
(like in stocks 1928-1929 created by UNDER-CONSUMPTION,
OVER-PRODUCTION and EXCESSIVE SPECULATION). More
precisely, how can they prop up the market, yet prevent an even bigger
artificial bubble and still allow the market healthy corrections of
excesses. In effect, they must micro-manage the stock market.
History does show the leading DJIA it needs periodically to drop
back 10% and go sidewise for many months to allow each subsequent
advance to be on a firmer foundation. Can the FED really do this
and also still strengthen the US economy?
Very doubtful. The recovery is so fragile and so artificial.
The under-employment and low real wages cry out for stimulus
and re-direction of Wealth. But Wall Street want profits and big
bonuses; and the Fed must listen to Wall Street. It's the
same thing with the Wall Street- favored policies of "free trade"
and "free capital-flow". Jobs keep being lost as manufacturing
jobs and capital are outsourced. Obama, Wall Street's Democratic
puppet, is utterly silent on trade issues, like the Korean dumping
of steel in the US. Yet somehow the FED must not let the real
US economy based on manufacturing close shop entirely.
I think theirs is an impossible task.
How can they resolve all the economic contradictions posed
by a Wall Street controlled economy and still be loyal to their
Fed officials are smart. They must know how how dangerous
not to prevent too big a "consumption gap" as occurred in 1928-1929.
This is when workers are too poor to buy all the goods produced, so that
prices and then corporate profits fall producing a CRASH.
Unfortunately, the system always demand more profits and the
best way to make more Wall Street profits are these 5 things:
1) Lower and lower paid wages,
2) Exporting more jobs and manufacturing overseas,
3) Monopolization. The corporate buy outs of competitors.
4) Wall Street hyping the stock market,
5) Wall Street and Corporate control of American politicans.
Though It's easy to see the contradictions inherent in a Wall Street
dominated economic system. But Wall Street does not want to
be reformed. And Wall Street runs the FED.
Where Will The DJI Go?
The FED Is Afraid To Allow Any Market Decline.
Meanwhile, it does seem as though the FED is afraid of allowing a
10% correction in the DJI. They are afraid that all the contradictions
and the negative momentum would quickly take control. But a
market that only rises poses very big risks. When finally a decline
of more than 10% occurs it can be the beginning of a collapse.
That was certainly true in January 2008. See below. So, another
super bear market may lie ahead if the FED does not better control
the market's advance and let it be punctuated once in a while with
healthy corrections. So, far their twin policies of low interest rates
and maximum transparency and predictability have served to produce
a market that is more and more over-extended by many historical
CEO GREED IS STARTING TO HURT CHIPOTLE
We recommended CMG here when the stock was under $50 in December 2008.
Now it's over $600. Wall Street is happy. But the workers there are not.
They are paid less than $8.70 an hour while the two co-CEOs have paid
themselves $18-21 million/year since 2011. Shareholders should take
notice that customer complaints are becoming much more common,
too, epsecially about CMG's over-charging. This is a big change from
the way I was treated back in 2008. It's just no fun eating in a place
when you have to squabble for a fair portion at a fair price.
5/1/2014 Paul Krugman's Seminar on Recessions at Princeon.
Seminar Materials and Lecture Notes (free) Bio Blog http://www.krugmanonline.com/
4/21/2014 The Blood of Ukraine is now
on Obama's Hands!
Obama's new and dangerous COLD WAR WITH RUSSIA comes at the
a high price as peace and democracy in the Ukraine look more and more
remote. So does cooperation with Russia in other matters,
such as developing anti-terrorist approaches and finding a way
to take the chemical weapons away from Assad in Syria.
Princeton Russian scholar, Stephen Cohen, warned today that the probability
of an all-out Ukrainian civil war is high. In this, America is threatening Russia
so directly that it there is great risk for us. The entire Anerican media says
this is all Putin's fault. But it has been NATO which keeps placing its
missiles closer and closer to Russia's borders, despite its pledge in 1990
that it would not do this. Now it is the West which has pulled the deeply
divided Ukraine apart and played a key role in overthrowing the Yanukovych
government, which though corrupt was, in fact, duly elected.
What's worse? The US has apparently chosen to back the extreme
right-wing, openly Fascist Svoboda Party. Cohen warns that if an
all-out civil war breaks out, the moderates will disappear and there
will be much worse violence.
Russian speaking Eastern Ukrainian separtists are now using the very
same techniques the Kiev fascists used to topple the government
there. Masks, bullets, molotov cock-tails, fires, occupation of
government buildings. The US has spent $5 billion in over-throwing
the Yanukovych government. How much more money must Obama
waste on another war and fighting a half a world away? He just has
no back-bone. He can't say "NO" to the neo-Cons who control him
like a puppet.
Back in 1990, the US promised Gorbachev that if East and West Germany
united and joined NATO, there would be no more Eastern expansion of
NATO. This was quickly violated as each American President moved NATO
missiles closer to Russia. How else but as part of an aggressive anti-Russian
US strategic plan can Putin see this?
|2 March 1999||Czech Republic|
|29 March 2004||Bulgaria|
|1 April 2009||Albania|
America played a key role in bringing about the coup in the Ukraine.
A leaked tape shows how involved deeply the US was in the over-throw
of the democratically elected government there. Obama's Administration
now is clearly quite prepared to embrace the fascist Svoboda Party
as the main force in the new Ukraine Government. This is tragic,
deceitful and immoral considering what America should be standing for.
It is a formula for civil war. Fascism is a highly charged fear in Russia
where 20 million died in World War I because of Fascism.
The US and the CIA have staged many such coups.
Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973 were among the most flagrantly
anti-democratic. Millions died as a result. So another coup by the US
should not come as much surprise. It, too, comes at a great human cost.
The Ukrainian Coup was all planned quite openly.
" In September 2013, one of Ukraines richest oligarchs, Viktor Pinchuk,
paid for an elite strategic conference on Ukraines future that was held
in the same Palace in Yalta, Crimea, where Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill
met to decide the future of Europe in 1945...
"The participants included Bill and Hillary Clinton, former CIA head General David Petraeus,
former U.S. Treasury secretary Lawrence Summers, former World Bank head Robert Zoellick,
Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt, Shimon Peres, Tony Blair, Gerhard Schröder,
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Mario Monti, Lithuanian president Dalia Grybauskaite, and
Polands influential foreign minister Radek Sikorski. Both President Viktor Yanukovych,
deposed five months later, and his recently elected successor Petro Poroshenko
3/25/2014 Crimea? Russian Aggression? Not really.
Obama and Kerry Are "Lying Through Their Teeth",
So Are America's Corporate Media, just as they did
in the march to war with Iraq over imaginary WMDs.
Once you see this, it makes you wonder what else
they are misleading us about.
Kerry's Deception and Bald-Faced Cozenry
from Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D. - Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. Columnist
for Business Week and Scripps Howard News Service.
If you want to learn the part of the story Americans typically never hear,
Roberts' website is a healthy antidote to what passes as journalism
in America. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
His background: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Craig_Roberts
"What has happened in Ukraine is the United States organized
and financed a coup.
"And the coup occurred in Kiev, the capital. Either from intention or carelessness,
the coup elements include ultra-right-wing nationalists whose roots go back to organizations
that fought for Hitler in the Second World War against the Soviet Union. These elements
destroyed Russian war memorials celebrating the liberation of the Ukraine from the Nazis
by the Red Army and also celebrating Gen. Kutuzov's defeat of Napoleon's Grande Armée.
"So this spread a great deal of alarm in southern and eastern Ukraine, which are traditionally
Russian provinces... Both of these Russian areas have been part of Russia for longer than
the United States has existed...
"(In re-joining Russia, these people) ...followed the same legal steps; the same UN procedures,
the same international court procedures. So everything that has occurred is strictly legal.
And when John Kerry and Obama say the opposite, they're lying through their teeth.
It's just blatant, shameful, bald-faced lies. This is not debatable or a question of opinion.
It's a matter of law."
What Lies Behind the Media Blackout on the truth about Crimea?
"A very important part of it has to do with something that happened toward the end of
[Bill] Clinton's second term. He permitted five mega companies to consolidate the
formerly independent and dispersed US media. What were once independent networks
like ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, they all became cogs in a larger media empire. The value
of these big media companies is their federal broadcast licenses: They can't go against
the government and expect them to be renewed.
Another big change is these media companies are no longer run by journalists.
They're run by corporate advertising executives and former government officials.
And their only interests are protecting the net worth of the company and the flow
of advertising revenues. So there is not an independent media. It cannot take positions
on any important issue contrary to the government's propaganda."
"A similar thing happened with the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. It was a lie
told over and over. And everyone repeated it. The New York Times didn't even go
to the weapons inspector we sent to Iraq, Hans Blix! Instead, Judith Miller repeated
a lie endlessly in the pages of the newspaper. It reflects a total lack of integrity. One
of the main reasons for this is that many of them know they cannot tell the truth,
otherwise they'll be fired. They know it's pointless to take a story that contradicts the
President or the Secretary of State or the CIA or the NSA to the editor. He or she will
look at you and say 'What are you crazy? Do you want to get us both fired?' So they
simply don't bother. It's quite a corrupt milieu, and it must be deadening to the soul.
But that's what it is to be a mainstream journalist today."
(Source: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/03/21/truthout-interviews-pcr/ )
3/22/2014 What is American Fascism?
Subsequenly, the best article I have found on American Fascism was published on
http://rt.com/op-edge/158904-us-fascists-right-sector-alliance/ It's hard to deny
how much fascism the US Government has regularly promoted in Latin America
and from time to time here at home. The author's conclusion is that it is the pressure
for profits from Wall Street that ultimately drives it. You judge...
Consider the answer given by VP Henry Wallace back in 1940.
His answer still applies.
"A fascist is one whose lust for money or power is combined with such an intensity of intolerance
toward those of other races, parties, classes, religions, cultures, regions or nations as to make him
ruthless in his use of deceit or violence to attain his ends. The supreme god of a fascist, to which
his ends are directed, may be money or power...
"The perfect type of fascist throughout recent centuries has been the Prussian Junker, who developed
such hatred for other races and such allegiance to a military clique as to make him willing at all
times to engage in any degree of deceit and violence necessary to place his culture and race
astride the world ...
"The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of
public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public
but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money
or more power.
"They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the
Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and
vested interest. Fascism in the postwar inevitably will push steadily for Anglo-Saxon
imperialism and eventually for war with Russia."
Fascism Has A Long Tradition among
Some of Most Well-Known Big Bankers
on Wall Street
>>> 1934 - Did you know that certain Wall Street planned a
Fascist coup against FDR in 1934? When was the last time
the American corporate media talked about this?
Mussolini and Hitler got much backing from rich Italians
and German corporations, whose leaders feared the Depression
would cause a government of, by and for the people would
challenge their opulence and the system of class advantages
that they depended on. FDR created the same fears with
his 100-days. More than anything else, it was FDR's taking
the US off the Gold Standard that caused a clique of wealthy
US bankers to plan a military coup against FDR. Major General
Smedley Butler was their pick to lead the coup and establish
a dictator. He was quite charasmatic. Conservative General
MacArthur praised him lavishly. He had led expeditions into Central
America to enforce American imperial control there to increase
profits for American plantation, telegraph, oil and mining
companies. So Wall Street industrialists trusted him.
In 1935, Butler rued:
"I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests
in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City
Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen
Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international
banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the Dominican
Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras
"right" for American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see
to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.... Looking back on it, I
felt I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to
operate his racket in three city districts. We Marines operated on three
His popular support of the Veterans' Bonus Army made him
one who the big bankers thought would be readily trusted by
a broad range of Americans. So, in early July 1933, Butler was
invited to be the leader of what amunted to a military coup
to oust FDR.
"The Committe for a Sound Dollar" representatives
wanted him first to speak to the American Legion's Council
condemning FDR's departure from the Gold Standard. Butler
found out that the speech was written by 1924 Democrat
Presidential Candidate, John Davis, who in 1934 was atturney
for JP Morgan. Butler demanded to speak to the moneyed
individuals behind this plan. In September, Singer Sewing heir,
Robert Sterling Clark, laid out the plan for him to lead a veterans'
coup. He stated to Butler that he would be glad to spend half
of his fortune to protect the other half.
Butler feined interest in this bankers' coup to learn who was
behind it. He was told to look to the new Liberty League's
supporters: JP Morgan, Dupont, General Motors, Democrat Al Smith,
Democrat John Davis... Butler saw that this would be a formidable
political force. He had a Philadelphia reporter secretly
learn more of this group's fascist intentions to subvert
FDR and Democracy. Butler was to be the "man of the
White Horse" Weapons could be acquired from Dupont and
millions more could be obtained from JP Morgan.
Butler a patriot, was disgusted by these Fascists. He
"went public". A Congressional hearing in the matter soon
followed. But the men who had approached Butler on behalf of
the Liberty League totally denied his allegations. One of main
conspriators. Gerald McGuire, a Wall Street bond trader with
connections to JP Morgan soon died of "natural causes" at 37.
In the end, the Congressional Committee investigating the matter,
decided not to require any leading bankers or industrialists to testify
and FDR decided not to challenge the Wall Street and call
them "fascist traitors". His mission was to reform Wall Street
not to make war with them.
See (1) Jules Archer (1973). The Plot to Seize the White House:
The Shocking True Story of the Conspiracy to Overthrow FDR.
(5) See http://www.takeoverworld.info/nazi-history.html
>>>> Wall Street Big Banks Funded Mussoline and Hitler in Their
Rise to Power.
Fascists on Wall Street play important roles in supporting German and
Italian Fascism's rise to power.
JPM Morgan's partner, Thomas Lamont, arra ged a $100 million
loan for Mussoline in 1026. He became JP Morgan's CEO in 1943.
Rockefeller's Standard Oil of NJ, and ITT, In 1947, US Judge Charles
Clark ruled rhT "Standard Oil can be considered an enemy national in
b=view od its relationships IG Farben after the US and Germany had become
Orenee DuPont loved Hitler. He was onbessed with his racist principles.
In 1926, DuPont advocated a race of super men.
( http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n41-20111021/16-18_3841.pdf )
Part>>> War Is Very Profitable. Trading with The Nazis.
George Walker Bush, Avrell Harriman and Dulles Brothers
"George Herbert 'Bert' Walker, a native of St. Louis, who founded the banking
and investment firm of G. H. Walker and Company in 1900. Later the company
shifted from St. Louis to the prestigious address of 1 Wall Street. .... Walker was
one of Hitler's most powerful financial supporters in the United States. The
relationship went all the way back to 1924, when Fritz Thyssen, the German
industrialist, was financing Hitler's infant Nazi party. As mentioned in earlier
chapters, there were American contributors as well.
"Some Americans were just bigots and made their connections to Germany
through Allen Dulles's firm of Sullivan and Cromwell because they supported Fascism.
The Dulles brothers, who were in it for profit more than ideology, arranged American investments
in Nazi Germany in the 1930s to ensure that their clients did well out of the German
economic recovery. "
"Young George was in flight school in October 1942, when the U.S. government
charged his father with running Nazi front groups in the United States. Under the
Trading with the Enemy Act, all the shares of the Union Banking Corporation were
seized, including those held by Prescott Bush as being in effect held for enemy nationals.
Union Banking, of course, was an affiliate of Brown Brothers, Harriman, and Bush
handled the Harrimans' investments as well.
"Once the government had its hands on Bush's books, the whole story of the
intricate web of Nazi front corporations began to unravel. A few days later two of
Union Banking's subsidiaries -- the Holland American Trading Corporation and
the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation -- also were seized. Then the government
went after the Harriman Fifteen Holding Company, which Bush shared with his father-
in-law, Bert Walker, the Hamburg-Amerika Line, and the Silesian- American Corporation.
The U.S. government found that huge sections of Prescott Bush's empire had been
operated on behalf of Nazi Germany and had greatly assisted the German war effort."
Brown Brothers, Harriman was another bank that specialized in investments in Germany.
Despite this, Averill Harriman.was a leading Democrat for many years. e then. http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm.
>>> Setting up and Supporting Fascist Dictatorships around The World
to Aid Wall Street and The Biggest American Corporations.
Cuba, Iran, Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Chile ...
Google together "Wall Street" "CIA", "FASCISM", "DICTATORSHIP", country...
You'll have a lot to read.
Why The American Rush To A New Cold War?
Why Is American Reporting about The Ukraine So One-Sided and Anti-Russian?
Did you know?
1) Crimea has been Russian since 1783.
2) It has never been Ukrainian to rule.
3) Krushchev (a Ukrainian) gave Crimea to Ukraine to Administer for the Kremlin.
4) Crimea while part of Ukraine from 1991-2014 was always Autonomous.
5) Ukrainians in the Crimea are only 24.3%. Russians are 58.3%
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimea )
Americans were also lied to in 2008 about the Georgian attack on Russians.
"Don't you wonder why all the reports on TV and in the news now omit the most significant
and salient fact, namely, that Georgia attacked South Ossetia.
No one mentions that when Georgia left the USSR in 1991, South Ossetia chose to stay
a part of Russia, as it had been since 1761. As the Georgian attack began,
FOX News interviewed a little girl. The Fox interviewer asked her the bad Russians.
The girl told him that Georgia had first killed many of her people and killed
a barrack full of Russians peacekeepers..The interviewer then quickly cut her off ."
( http://www.tigersoftware.com/TigerBlogs/August-21-2008/ )
In my previous Blog (See just below.) I suggested that the main reason America has been
so quick to side with Ukrainian thugs and fascists was because Obama and Hillary were afraid
of the American far-right in the 2012 Congressional Elections. In their timidity and lack of
leadership, they seemed to be behaving as ignobly as Tsar Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm did in 1914
when they refused to offend or say "NO" to their own war-mongeringnationalists just as World War I
was about to start.
But that's only part of the story. There's something more sinister here.
Wall Street is probably behind the pro-Fascist Ukrainian policy of the Obama Administration
and behind Hillary Clinton. Wall Street 's Political Leaders, just like Prescott Bush,
the Dulles Brothers, the Duponts, JP Morgan, stc.... have a long history of helping Fascists
overthrow democratically elected governments so that their investnents would be secure,
more profitable and be expanded by the US-dependent dictator. .Some of these even traded
illegally with the enemy, as Prescott Bush did in World War II with Germany. .
Is this being too cyncial? I don't think so.
Wall Street owns Obama. He is their puppet!
See how Wall Street now controls nearly everything significant that
Obama does as far as the economy goes. Look at how completely
this Democratic President has turned over his Administration to
people from Wall Street. See how Obama has done along with the
sending of American jobs overseas via "Free" Trade and actually
encouraged big corporations to import cheap-labor made goods
into America. Big Wall Street banks were Obama's largest campaign
contributors. He had paid them back by refusing to prosecute
any big banks' CEOs despite the massive evidence of systematic
fraud in their selling sub-standard mortgages to unsuspecting
pensioners. Obama re-appointed Bernanke, Wall Street's big
supporter to be Fed Chairman. Bernanke first accepted billions
of Dollars worth of substandard mortgages as well as collateral
for Fed loans. Later he arranged the massive QE-I, QE-2 amd QE-3,
to buy up several trillion dollars worth of long-term home
mortages from the big banks. Obama has also done nothing
to prevent Wall Street CEOs from paying themselves ridiculously
obscene amounts. He has not proposed new taxes on Wall Street.
He has not proposed a new tax on stock transactions to pay for
a more SEC policing of Wall Street. And he has pursued a
a 100% No-Prosecution of Anti-Trust Laws (example Comcast and Time Warner).
The Puppet-Master Behind
The Democrats' Rush To Cold War
Zbignieu Brezinzki was
Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor when Iran broke
ranks with American anti-Communism and kicked out
the fascist, terrorist Shah in their own Revolution.
Zbignieu Brezinzki was also the one who made LBJ
think that fighting the Viet Kong was vital to prevent more
Communist dominoes from falling.
Brezinski was the one who put Hillary up to calling Putin
a modern-day Hitler. Of Putin's military protection of
the Russian speaking people in Georgia, Brezinski declared
that Putin was "following a course that is horrifyingly similar to that taken
by Stalin and Hitler in the 1930s". Russians suffering in Georgia
and now Georgia, Brezinski is saying is not real. It is being
trumped up by Putin just as Hitler had alleged that ethnic Germans
had suffered in pre-1938 Czechoslavakia. (Source.)
And he's also the one who Obama and Kerry are listening to
when they prop up the Fascist Svoboda Party as
their new partners in a very dangerous new anti-Russian
US foreign policy.
Brezinski wrote on March 3rd:
"Putins thuggish tactics in seizing Crimea offer some hints
regarding his planning. He knew in advance that his thinly
camouflaged invasion would meet with
popular support from the Russian majority in Crimea. (!!!)
... He went in masked like a Mafia gangster."
Brezinski's aristocratic family hails from Gallicia in
Poland and Eastern Ukraine. He grew up like many Poles
hating the Soviet regime,with good reason. Stalin personally
ordered that 22,000 Polish officers and intelligentsia were to be shot by the
NKVD March 1940. (See Katyn Forest Massacre.
(This is not be be confused with massive Nazi massacres, mostly
of Jews at Babi Yar in Kiev, in Lublin and Odessa ) Making
Poles hate Stalin and the Soviets even more was their
refusal in 1944 to allow the Red Army, which was camped
nearby on the Eastern side of the Vistula, to come to the aid
of the Polish Uprising in Warsaw against the Nazis in August
and September, as the German Army was in full retreat.
In fact, Stalin refused Churchill's requests to let British
and American planes provide supplies to the Polish Warsaw
rebels. As a result, 150,000-200,000 Poles were killed
when the Germans retaliated and leveled one quarter of all of Warsaw.
Stalin, it was believed, wanted to destroy any potential Polish
resistance to the Soviet control of Poland after the war.
In this he succeeded. By 1946, Poland had become a puppet
state completely under under Stalin's control.
Totalitarian states are were never as perfectly or perpetually
stable as Brezinski taught. He was wrong to compare the
role of Communist ideology in the perpetuation of the power
of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to the Catechism
and the New Testament to the Power and longevity of the
Roman Catholic Church.
When Stalin died, Krushchev and others attacked his reign of terror
and his "cult of personality". Many in Eastern Europe and
Russia openly challenged economic centralization and the
leading role of the Party. Workers in the "puppet states" of
Hungry and Poland rebelled. They saw how the Communist leader
Tito had kept Yugoslavia free from Moscow. At first, they merely
sought their own road to socialism. But soon, widespread cries
were heard from people wanting free elections that included non-
Communist parties. Such were the dynamics of change in the
But Brezinski, it seems, had never forgiven the Russians for what
the actions of Stalin in World War II. Soviet Communist totalitarian
power and terror were too all-powerful for him to believe that
even a moderate Polish nationalism as expressed by Gomulka
in Poland could succeed without being suppressed by Moscow.
That was was my complaint with Brezinski in 1965 when I took
classes with him as a Russian Studies student at Columbia.
When I told him I was interested in "economic revisionism in
Eastern Europe, he sent me to Radio Free Europe in New York
to study their translations of the economic reformers in Poland,
Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. From this, it became clear
to me that detailed Soviet central planning must give way.
And if Moscow could no longer make all-encompassing
and detailed determinations about how and what the economy
was produce, then what was the proper of the Party in society.
But Brezinski did not like my conclusions that economic revisionism
must eventually liberalize Communism and decentralize economic
power, even to the point of giving individuals the ultimate right
as consumers, to make economic and political choices freely. In
the short run, he was right. In 1969, the Red Army crushed
the liberal economic revisionism that was taking hold
in Prague, Czechoslovakia. It was at this time that the
Czech economist, Otto Sik, proposed "Market Socialism".
In this, he was 20 years ahead of Gorbachev.
I felt Brezinski was less interested in the seeds of change
that Otto Sik and other Communist revisionists were sewing
in Eastern Europe than in perpetuating the Cold War. He
could not understand that Ho Chi Minh was popular, just
as Tito was, for resisting outside enemies. Ho was not
Hitler. He was re-uniting his own country. He was not
expanding as Hitler and the NAZIs did into Czechoslavakia
or Poland. But Brezinski made no such distinctions. He
was a Cold Warrior who equated Communism with Stalinism.
Strangely, he now equates Putin with Hitler. For him,
Communism is Nazism. It is all the same. It is totalitarianism.
I saw the dynamics of liberalization in the Soviet Bloc as
imevitable in 1965 When I came up for oral examination at Columbia
in getting a Ph.D., he did not agree with my assertions about
this. As a result, I did not write my dissertation on economic
revisionism and instead chose the "safer" subject of the
role of the Chancellor of the Exchequer in British Cabinet Politics.
Now Obama and Wall Street have taken a liking to the Brezinski Plan for
encircling and then breaking up Russia so that American financial
interests can carve up what's left of the old Soviet Empire.
They do not see how his advise is warped by his life-long hatred
of Russia. Instead, they see his plan as a way to aid their patrons
on Wall Street in buying Russian assets on the cheap.
(See for example: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37878.htm )
Why else would the reporting on the Crimean "Crisis" be so
one sided in the New York Times, Washington Post, CBS, etc.?
Wall Street has now decided to have American foreign policy use
Ukrainian Fascists to conquer and fragment Russia. They
want the Interational Monetary Fund to take hold of Ukrainian
finances just as they have Greece and Spain. To Wall Street's
thinking, the moment must not be lost. This is so important, that
Wall Street has determined that no elite media dissent is to be
allowed. The new fascist Ukraine is too important to allow any real
Well, some Americans are dissenting. One is Stephen Cohen,
a long-time Russian affairs scholar.
Another is Max Blumenthal. Seehttp://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/24/1280154/-Max-Blumenthal-Is-the-U-S-Backing-Neo-Nazis-in-Ukraine
And I will write what I can. As I said, I had Brezinski as a teacher
and advisor at Columbia in the 1960s. He easily got carried away
with his anti-Russian thinking. It was his mistaken global thinking
that led to the "Falling Dominoes" excuse for the War on Viet Nam
tragedy in which many millions died. Even in 1991, weeks before its
breakup, Brezinski did not foresee the breakup of the Soviet Union.
Unfortunately, back in 1965, I could see how much in grading me he
favored points that agreed with his own thinking. The USSR was an
evil totalitarian state like Hitler's. It could never change from within.
All in all, my personal take on him then and now is that while
he is brilliant, he is highly rigid and dogmatic. He searches mainly
for evidence that fits in with his own thinking. He is still fighting the
Cold War. He is not flexible or open-minded. Yet he is the leading thinker
in producing the Democrats' dangerously bellicose, anti-Russian foreign policy.
Lost in this is any concept of mutual interest and cooperation in fighting
Fascism or providing for legitimate national security interests or
helping Ukraine become economically self-sufficient and prosperous.
Unfortunately, very few in America realize how one-sided is the
ant-Russian news they are getting. But at least, more and more
Americans do see the Democrats' foreign policy is not much different
than Republicans. Both parties support a US military budget which
spends more money on weapons, wars and overseas' bases than the
next 10 biggest countries do.
Why The Ukraine Should Matter To Americans.
(1) The 20th Century Conclusively Shows That Unchecked,
Visceral Nationalism Starts and Fosters Big Wars!
(2) Political Timidity and Pandering to Right-Wing Nationalist/
Militarist Pressure Groups in This Context Also Make for World Wars.
(3) Military-Industrial-Complex pawns, Hillary Clinton and Obama
can be compared very unfavorably in their timidity and lack of moral
courage to Tsar Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm. Ron Paul is the only politician
American Congressmen who is bold enough to say the "Ukraine is
none of our business". American interventions abroad are "unconstitutional",
"arrogant", "ineffective", "pro-fascist" and vastly wasteful
of the US Treasury. They only serve the interests of certain
high placed US corporate and banking interests.
(4) American Ignore Russia's Legitimate Security Needs,
at Great Peril! We do not want a "Reverse Cuban Missile Crisis"
taking us to the brink of nuclear war.
The Lessons of World War I-
World War I was a war brought on by unrestrained Nationalism,
by Political Cowardice and by Generals who sought military mobilization
in crisis rather than careful restraint.
Nationalists in Serbia set in motion the build-up to World War I. They
trusted Russia would protect them. And, in fact, the Tsar could not say
"No" to his pro-Serbian, pan-Slavic Generals who wanted Russia to
become the protector of little Serbia against Austria. Similarly,
Kaiser Wilhelm could not say "No" to Austria or to his generals who wanted to
mobilize massively if Russia mobilized its army against Austria.
As it turned out, the Tsar's Generals had no plans for a partial
mobilization against only Austria. But, when Germany went to war
with Russia, it automatically by treaty, had to go to war with France
and soon the UK. The Generals did not foresee how deadly and
how futile war in the XXth Century would be. Worse, all the Royal
Families of Europe utterly lacked the moral courage to say "No"
to their generals who wanted to unleash their armies in a new war..
The Lessons of World War II -
World War II was a war of evil design.
Is Putin Really The New Hitler? Hillary Seems To Thinks So.
If World War I was started by leadersip failures by both Generals and politicians,
World War II was largely started by one megalomaniac in a sea of
pacifism, itself the result of people looking back at the mistakes of World War I.
If in 1935 France and Britain had sought militarily to prevent the small
German army's reoccupation of the Rhineland, World War II might have
been averted. Hitler himself acknowledged this. But he got away
with this act of defiance. His prestige grew and in French and British
pacifism, he saw weakness he could exploit.
In 1936, Hitler devised a systematic plan to achieve Lebensraum by 1944.
Many German Generals could see this was delusional and dangerous for Germany.
Some even planned to assassinate him in 1938. But Prime Minister Chamberlain
distrusted such talk. His gift of the Sudetenland to Germany completely
undercut these German Generals. After the Munich concessions
of September 1938, the Generals were afraid to turn against Hitler until 1944.
Without their challenge, Hitler easily fabricated grievances of ethnic Germans
in Poland to justify his attack in August 1939. By this time, he did
not care that France was bound by treaty to protect Poland against his
attack. He felt his armies were invincible. In May 1940, 6 months after
his Wehrmacht had attacked Poland, he foolishly chose to attack France.
He did not have to attack Belgium, Holland or France. World War II only started
in earnest when he did. His attack on Russia in 1941 was even more insane.
It was as though had heard of Napoleon, the Russian Winter or War and Peace.
His declaration of war against the US was equally foolish.
Surely, Hillary Knows Better.
Hillary is wrong. Putin is no Hitler. He has no plans for a grandiose multi-continent
Russian expansionism. Russia is economically far too weak. But Russia
has had a big naval base in the Crimea for 220 years. The openly
fascist Svoboda Party and the chaos in Ukraine threaten that warm-water base.
In addition, the Ukrainian extreme nationalists are, in fact, a very real threat
to Russian speaking people. This is not a trumped-up charge.
The Fascists Next Door to Russia
Svoboda's young march under the same crooked cross used by the
NAZI SS. Svoboda's leader gives his "Heil Hitler" salute to the party faithful.
Please read what Max Blumenthal has to say about the Ukraine's neo NAZIs.
Svoboda is now the leading Party in the new right-wing, anti-Russian Government,
Westerners are not offered the Russian viewpoint in this. Fascism killed 20 million
Russians in WW-II. Many of these Fascists were Western Ukrainian. How could
any Russian allow hostile Fascist-controlled missiles to be pointed at Moscow
from only 400 miles away? Only a year ago, the Europeon Union was warning
Ukrainian political parties about cooperating with the ultra-right extremeists
in the Svoboda Party. How did Americans feel with Cuban missiles pointed
at Washington from a 1000 miles away back in 1962? Americans risked a
nuclear war to get Cuba to abandon its missiles. What if the Russians did
the same? Surely, this must be avoided.
A Fascist Hero in Ukraine
Stepan Bandera is on a 2009 postage stamp commemorating the 100th
anniversary of his birth
Back in 1992, soon after the Ukraine became independent, the highest state honor,
Hero of Ukraine
The Ukraine, I think, is much more like Yugoslavia in 1991, than
Germany and Central Europe in the late 1930s. Nationalist differences
now in the Ukraine are similar to those that broke up
Yugoslavia in the 1990s, but in a much more dangerous part of the world.
"During 1990, Communists lost the power to nationalist parties
on first multi-party elections held across the country, except in Serbia
and Montenegro, where they were won by Miloevic and his allies.
Nationalist rhetoric on all sides became increasingly heated. In 1991,
one by one republic proclaimed independence (only Serbia and Montenegro
remained federated), but status of Serb minorities outside Serbia was
left unsolved. After a string of inter-ethnic incidents, Yugoslav Wars
ensued, first in Croatia and then, most severely, in multi-ethnic
Bosnia and Herzegovina". (wikopedia) The wars pitted the US and UN
observers against the Russian backed Serbians.
The proximity to Russia to the Ukraine could easily make any instability there become
very dangerous. Hostility, fear and mistrust are now becoming self-perpetuating, as
at the height of the Cold War. The US views Putin as an empire-builder
who would get in the way of the Ukraine's wishes to join the EEC. Russia
sees this as economic imperialism. It fully reciprocates, readily noting
America's frequent support of fascist, anti-democratic governments who
serve US corporate interests.
Let's hope the Generals are a lot smarter this time around. The politicians
are very scary. Publicly, Obama and Clinton dismiss legitimate Russian
security concerns as simply plans to conquer and control lands that they
have no security interests in. That just is not true. Why do they keep
pandering to the American extreme right? Why does the American corporate
media fail to challenge their false attribution of Hitler-like motives to Hitler?
Obama and Clinton seem just about as dumb as those who took Europeons
into World War I. We deserve better. But are the Republicans any better?
That's the real danger, isn't it?
I think the Russians are much more restrained than America would be.
America's history is replete with military invasions and CIA interventions,
almost all designed to help expand the US's economic sway. This list
is much longer than you know.
Obama's Trust of Wall Street Seems Stupider and Stupider.
US Jobs and Wages Sour, but not on Wall Street.
Progressives Feel Even More Snookered by Democrats.
Harry Truman Would Have Known How To Handle These Profiteers.
Average Hourly Wages have declined since 2009.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has more than doubled.
"Obscener". That's what Wall Street wages are becoming.
"Last week JPMorgan Chase's Board approved a 74 percent pay raise for its CEO,
Jamie Dimon, for 2013, a year when JPMorgan barely escaped a criminal penalty
and paid $20 billion in fines and penalties for wrongdoing -- much of it on his watch.
...In 2013, Dimon made $9,615 per hour. (This is ) more in the first two hours
of the first workday of the year than a minimum-wage worker made all year long.". (Source)
"The top 40 hedge fund managers and traders in 2012 were paid a combined $16.7 billion.
This is the same amount that 400,000 average workers got.
The wealth of four members of the Walton family is greater than $100 billion.
That's more than the poorest 40% of Americans. And they are using every penny
they have to keep the Government from touching any of their entirely inherited wealth.
The latest Jobs Report belies Obama's boasting about all the jobs
his Administration's economic policies have helped create. For
obvious reasons, he chose not to talk about how wages for working
people keep falling and vital Public Sector jobs keep disappearing.
Sadly, private sector jobs are not being created fast enough to keep
up with the US population's growth. Obama has failed. And he's
utterly failed to fight for progressive and fairer economic policies.
We might just as well have had a Republican from Wall Street running the
country. This was no accident. The Democratic Establishment
has snookered us into thinking Obama was a Progressive. We won't
forget this treachery.
To be fair, Obama has always said he believes in the "free market".
Progressives just didn't take such comments seriously. Surely, he was
not a believer in lassez-faire. Anyone with a smattering of knowledge of
US history knows WHY child labor laws are needed, WHY mining is regulated,
and WHY the poorest workers need to be protected from brutal exploitation.
Surely, Omama had read about the coming of the New Deal...
Five years in office, i still see no evidence that he knows any XXth
century history. He may quote Lincoln, but never, never mentions
FDR or Truman, have you noticed. What's worse? Obama believes in
"free trade". In other words, corporations can send as many jobs overseas
as they want, fire as many as they wish and hire as few as they like.
Capital is free to leave the country anytime it wishes and it does!
Finally five years into his office as President, Obama suggests that the
minimum wage should be raised. Note that he has no plans to prevent
Corporations from paying their CEO and Board of Directors obscene
sums. Naturally, "no drama" Obama says nothing about a wealth tax,
Nor does he hint at a higher tax on capital gains or a tax on parasitic
computerized intra-day trading by the big banks. Sometimes, he offers
us a little populist rhetoric to fool us, but the point is he does nothing
that helps us or makes a difference.
He should forget about Wall Street. He should take them on. The Big
Banks caused the collapse. They are taking money out of the real
economy to pump up stock prices and make millionaires into billionaires.
He should study FDR and Truman. Truman knew Big Wealth was against
pitted against the little guy. He fought Wall Street and big corporations
every step of the way. Sure the Dow Jones Industrial Average marked time
for three years between January 1, 1946 when it stood at 191.3 and
December 31, 1949 when it was 192.7, but the average hourly wage in
the US rose steadily and handily from $0.86 to $1.27.
( See http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/AHEMAN.txt )
| Harry Truman denounced war-profiteering as
treason. But that
never stopped Halliburton, Exxon or Wall Street. We are still
at war in Afghanistan!
"During World War II, I called war profiteering, 'TREASON'.
People who make millions off the blood of our young soldiers are
the most DESPICABLE OF HUMAN SCUM! We all know
what the punishment for treason is. Don't we?"
Obama should read Truman's Labor Day address
in Detroit on September 6, 1948. Here was a real President.
"Two years ago the people of this country, and many workingmen among them,
seemed to feel that they wanted a change. They elected the Republican 80th Congress--
and they got their change. That Congress promptly fell into the familiar Republican pattern
of aid for big business and attack on labor. The Republicans promptly voted themselves
a cut in taxes, and voted you a cut in freedom...Important Republican newspapers have
already announced in plain language that Republicans in Congress are preparing further
and stronger measures against labor. If the congressional elements that made the
Taft-Hartley law are allowed to remain in power, and if these elements are further
encouraged by the election of a Republican President, you men of labor can expect to be hit
by a steady barrage of body blows. And if you stay at home, as you did in 1946, and keep
these reactionaries in power, you will deserve every blow you get. (WOW - he was blunt!)
If you let the Republican administration reactionaries get complete control of this Government,
the position of labor will be so greatly weakened that I would fear, not only for the wages
and living standards of the American workingman, but even for our Democratic institutions
of free labor and free enterprise. Remember that the reactionary of today is a shrewd man.
He is in many ways much shrewder than the reactionaries of the twenties. He is a man with a
calculating machine where his heart ought to he. He has learned a great deal about how to get
his way by observing demagogues and reactionaries in other countries. And now he has many
able allies in the press and in the radio.
So, what good is he, I ask? Even his Obama Care looks more and more like
a big give-away to medical insurance companies, pharmaceuticals
and biotechs. Remember, he would not even put the Public Option into
the new health insurance system. Of course, medical insurance companies
will do their best NOT to honor their part of the new contracts. And who
know what most doctors will do. I wrote 5 years ago that Obama was either
very naive or very corrupt (my conclusion then) in telling us that we should
all just trust the private medical insurance companies like Anthem Blue Cross.
Didn't he know how bad their track record was? How they arbitrarily riased
premiums, denied benefits and refused to even take calls when cutomers
complained. (See the Blog just below about this.) Paul Krugman saw Obama's
abandonment of the "Public Option" in 2009 as the beginning of his
"Trust Problem". I date it back to March 2009 and to his Wall Street friendly
appointments. See TigerSoft Blog: 3/19/2009 Who's Lying? Obama Brazenly Coddles
Wall Street Crooks.
Sure, he says he wants the minimum wage to be raised to $9 or $10/hour.
But if the minimum wage from 1980 were to be adjusted for inflation, it
would now be way over $16/hour. What's worse? Obama conveniently forgets
to mention how the average for all worker's wages are falling behind Wall Street's.,
The truth is ugly. It shows how the rich have waged class warfare against
millions and millions of American workers who have been betrayed by
Obama. "Wages are stuck, and barely rose at all in 2013. They were
up 1.9 percent last year, or a mere 0.4 percent after accounting for inflation.
Not only was that increase even smaller than the one recorded in 2012,
it was half the normal rate of wage gains in the two decades before the
last recession." (NY Times) The average age for someone being "paid a
"minimum wage is 35; most work full time; more than one-fourth are parents;
and, on average, they earn half of their families total income." (NY Times)
Spineless and Ignorant, Obama Coddles The Rich
while Millions Get Poorer and Can't Find Work.
When you dig a little deeper, his betrayal becomes even more obvious.
He agreed to an extension of the Bush tax cuts for the super-rich. He agreed
to exempt as much as $10 million from any estate taxes. He lowered the
estate tax rate down to a measly 35%. At the time, the US was $15 trillion debt.
This one decision saved the Walton heirs $17 billion in taxes.
Precisely because of all of Obama's efforts to get along with Republicans,
to please Wall Street and Big Business, he lets go unchallenged all the
right-wing austerity nonsense that politicans should from the 1930s tragedy
already know does not work. But Obama knows no history. Whatever
he took in college, it certainly was not economic history! A real Progressive
could easily demolish the right wing lie that you fix a broken economy
suffering from a financial collapse and high unemployment by laying
off millions of public sector workers.
Even if he only got a "C" in an Economic History course, he would know
in a deep recession, the Public Sector must be the employer of last
resort. It must hire all these people who can't find private sector jobs.
This rebuilds consumer demand and confidence, But Obama defers to
the rich, who want only to pay low wages, so that their profits will go
up and up. The bankers he voted to bale out have gotten more federal
money than all the Public Works programs taken together since he was
in office. And when was a big banker put on try for Fraud, Theft or
Insider Trading during the Crash? Never!
Obama has placed his bet on the Rich and Wall Street, hoping there
would be some trickle-down for the rest of America. Well, he has failed.
The Republicans are right. He should resign. He has no answers.
As a result, the public sector keeps falling, despite the collapsing and aging
infrastructure everywhere. And now private sector in the US have fallen
below the level needed simply to provide enough jobs even to keep
up with population growth. 165,000 new jobs a month are needed to do that.
Look at the numbers recently.
If only for reasons of fairness and compassion, the Government has to be
the employer of last resort because capitalism seldom provides full employment,
much less decent pay. It does produce financial panics and high unemployment.
And it always always over-pays its chief executives for "work" that has very little
redeeming social value.
This rate of job creation will only make worse the near-record level of
long-term unemployment. Officially, they say this is around 3.6 million.
The new job creation numbers hardly make a dent in the 20 million
who are either unemployed or underemployed and desperately need
more income. Only 63% of Americans over age 16 either had a job or were
looking for one. Many have given up or find the wages now offered would
barely cover the cost of driving to work. Capitalism and its creature, the
American political system are making millions go hungry. We have all
this wonderful technology. But it is wasted and goes unused because
Big Corporations choose to make profits elsewhere and in other ways.
Showing just how cut-throat and cruel, they really are Congress has just
cut the Food Stamp program and deny long-term Unemployment Benefits
to millions. Marx appears to have foreseen this exactly right. Capitalism
in America now does seem to depend on there being a large army of
unemployed. It serves to discipline the populace and keeps them begging
---------------- New Jobs -----------------
January +142,000 -29,000
Change in Employment
Percent Change in Employment
Articles on why Obama is not to be trusted by Progressives:
Summers lost because liberals don't trust Obama on financial reform
FOX and RUPERT MURDOCH
REACH ANOTHER NEW LOW IN
VILE, WANTON CRUELTY
They Show Us How Badly Meglomanical
Corporate MEDIA Intends To Treat Us All.
A Cruel Bait and Switch
Did you see American Idol last night? That's the show where young
Americans audition before three pop stars, Jennifer Lopez, Harry Connick Jr
and a blond fellow from New Zealand named Keith Urban for a chance
to be the "next American Idol."
No? Well, imagine yourself getting a free "Ticket to Hollywood"
to audition to be this year's "American Idol" on FOX. 300 singing hopefuls
each year for the last ten years have gotten the Golden Ticket, a trip to
Hollywood, where where they got put up in a nice hotel and allowed to
settle in semi-comfortably for the often months' long auditioning process.
Not this year. FOX's Rupert Murdoch decided this was too expensive.
This rich the Australian mogul decided that he wanted to play a
cruel joke on some of the American hopefuls. He wanted, I suppose,
to show off his power and teach the young innocents, just how cruel
the new world of media monopolies would be. Like many rich people,
he is an empire-builder, has little or no compassion and actually takes
sadistic pleasure in the inflicting pain on those they employ and can
control. Murdoch has set up his entire media chain to perpetrate
the myth that the poor are lazy and deserve no helping hand from the
Government even though they are the victims of Capitalism's greed
and its perpetual failure to deliver full employment or on all the promising
potential inherent in modern technoogy.
This year, for many the "Welcome to Hollywood" golden ticket turned out
to only be a ticket to an LA airport hanger and an immediate return flight home
the very same day after they fail a hurried-up audition right at LAX.
Fresh from their incoming flight to LA with bags in hand, all this
year's contestants were herded into a hanger. 50 of the contestants
were called out to do another audition. The half who failed
were not told they failed. Instead, they were put on an unmarked
bus back for their flights home. Humiliated, used and exhausted
they returned home, never having seen Hollywood.
How would you feel being treated like this?
There was no revolt from the contestants. There was no expression of anger
from any of these innocent kids. Why not? Because the 3 judges did not have
the nerve or character to tell them face-to-face that they were being immediately
sent back home, that they would not get to see Hollywood.
The American Idol Judges Were Especially Cruel
These 3 judges are each paid millions. They weren't going to challenge
Rupert Murdoch's sadistic Fox machine. They utterly lacked the moral fiber
to do that. They put them on an unmarked bus without telling them where
it was going. What "chicken-shit" lack of character, participating in this cruel
hoax, this sadistic bait and switch.
American Viewers Were Horrified.
I found 100s of horrified comments about the whole episode on Facebook.
Here is a typical one:
"How absolutely cruel and heartless to make these kids
'sing for their lives' (this is what the judges said) and then
send them home without ever being able to get a glimpse of California.
Were they even given anything to eat? They must have been
exhausted from the plane trip. Were they given an opportunity to rest
before getting back on to go home??? Did they even get a drink of water?
And the whole bus thing was beyond the pale. What did this accomplish
other than inflict horrendous mental anguish on them. I am just floored
by the cruelty of FOX and American Idol for permitting such torment
on these kids. Shame a million times over on you. I would sue if I were
them... American Idol must be desperate for ratings for them to sink
so low - torturing exhausted, disappointed kids. What's next - waterboarding?"
Many of The Rich Today Are Quite Cruel and Callous.
Lies and Cruelty Were Essentials in Their Rise To The Top.
It comes as no surprise, but researchers at UC Berkeley have proven
the obvious. Those who are wealthy were found to to be much more likely
to cheat, lie and break the law than those who were poor.
This cruelty is exactly what you we should expect, knowing that
the head of FOX, Rupert Murdoch's whole career as an empire-
builder has been marked by "unusual arrogance, thuggery and
deception." He sees himself as a master propagandist whose
empire has grown as he sought political favors from the right-wing
goernments of Reagan, Bush and Thatcher. For politicians in Beijing,
Washington and London this psychology makes Mr Murdoch an ideal media ally.
A wicked surpise greeting upon arrival awaited the hopefuls.
"Fail this audition and you can forget about seeing Hollywood
even for one single day. It's straight back home for you."
(All you get to see of LA is the inside of an airport hanger there
and a lesson from Fox about how cruel the right-wing
corporate media is at its rankest .)
This is not the first time. Fox and American Idol raised the hopes of some
of America's lids and then wantonly and cruelly dashed their hopes.
"American Idol" goes cruel, telling kids theyr'e in and then they're out. February 17, 2012
Ten ex-'American Idol' contestants sue show over alleged racism Jul 25, 2013
Is 'American Idol' Too Cruel to Kids? January 27, 2011
American Idol, Fox's sadistic musical bake-off Sep 4, 2002
'American Idol,'so needlessly cruel June, 14,2002.
It's also not the first time, I've complained about how they spread their
poison of cruelty and callousness to all America. Two years ago I wrote:
"I made the mistake of listening to FOX's Simon Cowell again on his glitzy
X-Factor show. It didn't take Simon more than 2 minutes to once more use the word "Karaoke"
as a categorical pejorative. His ultimate "put-down" of an inadequate performance is to
call it "Karaoke quality"...What crap! I realized that he's as ignorant as he is arrogant;
no mean feat, that. Why do Americans have to listen to rude Englishmen judging
American talent shows anyway? Why did Piers Morgan replace Larry King?
"One answer is because FOX and CNN want the broad mass of Americans
to feel inferior and deferential to their betters. That way the 1% can better control the 99%.
Too cynical? Well maybe. Another reason Simon gets away with his elitist snobbery is because
that he and the media are trying to make his shows seem to have singers of such a lofty
standard that it is quite unreachable for regular, everyday people to attain, unless they
have Simon's God-like guidance and approval. What a croc! He's a wanna-be English aristocrat
carving out his own empire using patronizing put-downs to bully the natives.
Fox has a lot to learn about respecting ordinary people."
Fox is owned and controlled by Rupert Murdoch. His life is proof of the psycho-pathology
of megliomanic greed, avarice and the pain it causes others he has stomped on in building
his empire. "As the scandal over Rupert Murdochs News Corporations illegal phone
hacking activities broke to television audiences around the world, I could not help but
wonder why? And I am sure many others asked themselves the same question. What prompted
Murdochs executives to condone illegal activities aimed at listening into private conversations?"
Rupert Murdoch's Fox Network of "Lies for Profits".
Rupert Murdoch Buys Bel Air Vineyard Estate For $28.8 Million
Murdoch was born rich. He inherited control of the Adelaide News in Australia..
He began buying other newspapers, including Sydney's Daily Mail, and in 1964 he launched Australia's
first national paper, The Australian. From then on, the growth of his media empire was rapid,
buying London's News of the World, the New York Post in 1976, the London Times in.1981
and finally the Wall Street Journal. He nope has full control of Twentieth Century Fox,
Fox Broadcasting and the publisher Collins. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corporation
BLUE CROSS DOUBLE CROSSES AMERICA
Thousands of Yelps say
Anthem Blue Cross is One Big Fraud
Now brought to millions more courtesy of Phony-Baloney Obama and
California's Insurance Commissioner, Phony-Baloney Dave Jones...
People need health care. They need insurance. But the evidence is
overwhelming that Blue Cross knows only how exploit them in their time of need.
"5 Stars? (Why so high?) This is for how well they screw their customers.
They are truly excellent at that. The people running this corporation are financial
geniuses! Here's their plan: spend almost nothing on customer service (hey,
why answer phones - ignore them and they'll go away), scrimp on claims staff,
deny claims without cause (so sue us if you don't like it!) and do everything
possible to limit interaction with customers and/or tangle them up with
time-wasting run-arounds. In short: Take the premiums. Pay as little as
possible on claims. Give zero customer service = make tons of profit!"
(And bribe State regulators, Congress and Obama, so they all bring new
customers to you all at public expense.)
Who will stop these thugs and crooks? Where are the lawyers that should
be suing Blue Cross? Where are the State Insurance Commissioners who
are not doing their job of protecting their people against fraud and theft?
Where are the newspapers that should be warning Americans of the frustrations
and failures Blue Cross has caused for years?
"Anthem is by far THE WORST health insurance you could ever
possibly get. I'm amazed that they are also by far the biggest in California
and the reason is people don't know what they don't know. They think
they are getting a good deal but they are getting horrible medical care."
12/23/2013 Hermosa Beach, CA "I switched to Anthem Blue Cross (PPO)
this year from Blue Shield and it is the worst medical insurance I have
ever had!! Do NOT ever get Anthem". 1/12/2014 Orange, CA
"Best way to get someone to take your call is to call the number for new sales.
They answer right away. No wait time. Guess we all know where their priorities are."
1/15/2014 Alameda, CA "The company is a total disaster. I cringe at what's
to come when actual claims are sent in. 1/15/2014 Topanga, CA Worst customer
service ever period. They "transitioned" my policy to be compliant with ACA,
and whoops, forgot to activate our new policy on January 1, even though they
were paid on time. I was told I was in the group of individuals who did not get
"uploaded" in some giant data dump. So customer service is blaming IT for
this problem. She also lied to me and said it would be resolved by the next
business day. This company is so screwed up I can only say, stay away from them,
Certainly Big government is often wasteful, remote and corrupt.
But I'm here to tell you nothing is more wasteful and corrupt than an unregulated
big corporation, like Anthem Blue Cross, when the government simply trusts them
to do the right thing, as ObamaCare has. I warned that this would happen two
years ago, by the way.
ObamaCare has given Blue Cross a ton of money to affordably insure millions
of average folks against bad health for the first time. A laudable objective,
in my mind. But Clue Cross should never have been trusted in the first places.
They are white collar thiugs and thieves. Nearly every new post about them
on Yelp and Facebook show this. And this pattern goes back a long time.
Back in 2009, I warned Democrats and Obama Care supporters not to trust Anthem Blue Cross.
In 2010 "California's insurance regulator said Monday his office has found
more than 700 violations by the state's largest for-profit health insurer, including
late payment of claims, giving misleading information to consumers and failing
to cooperate with regulators." Source.
California California State Insurance Commissioner, Dave Jones.
He's all boyish smiles, but he offers no real protection for California consumers!
I want to know why he allowed Anthem Blue Cross to be on the California
Insurance Exchange for individuals, but would not let them be on it
for businesses. He claimed they regularly over-charged businesses.
This suggests to me he thinks over-charging individuals is just fine.
His main priority is to protect businesses. I emailed him. No answer.
I'm not a priority to him either. No real surprise. He's just another
Dave Jones is now the Insurance Commissioner in California. Running for office, he said
"The insurance commissioner should be a strong advocate for consumers." Now he's in
charge? What will he do? I just called the Commission to find out if they are aware of all
the complaints about Anthem Blue Cross and was told I should write him a letter. Well,
I've writen him an email and will report if and how he responds. (No response two weeks
Below are a few typical Yelp comment about Antheem Blue Cross from 2010-2012,
before the ObamaCare became law.
"Worst customer service I have ever experienced---ever. I have been dealing with
one claim since May (it's now October 20th) and every time I call to follow up it takes
at least 25 minutes for my call to even get answered. Once my call actually gets answered,
BCBS comes up with a DIFFERENT reason why my claim hasn't been processed or
can't be processed. I then make whatever changes they tell me to make and ask to have
someone follow up. I have been promised by 4 separate "customer service SPECIALISTS"
to be called back/notified if something goes wrong with my claim, and each time,
I have been LIED to and have had to waste hours JUST trying to get back in touch myself."
"ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE. They OFTEN don't cover things the plan
says they do, unless you call them about it. EVERY TIME I CALL I GET
A DIFFERENT REASON WHY COVERAGE HAS BEEN DENIED, and then
they transfer me to someone else. Now they're telling me I have to resubmit to
a different leg of the company with a special different form. This is just corrupt." (Source).
"I completely agree with what everyone else is saying here.
I have covered benefits that they refuse to pay. At this point, they actually
owe me thousands of dollars in unpaid claims and I have called them over and
over again to get this resolved. Every time I call, people say they are working
on it, but I've been doing this for months! They seem to make up reasons for why
they won't pay for things (i.e. I sent in my claims to the ADDRESS on the CARD
and they say I have to submit it locally - in California). However, I have called
many times to get that address and NO ONE can tell me what that address is, or
how I submit it locally.
"This insurance company is a total scam. I'm convinced that they do everything
they can to not pay for things unless you call over and over again. I still have no
resolution on this and it's been many months. My provider and I have called multiple times
and the story is different every time. Right now I have been waiting for weeks for
someone to call me back. However, she never does. I call every other day right now
and get told "they're working on it.
"I have never dealt with an insurance company that seems so corrupt. It is a
covered benefit and they refuse to pay. If this isn't resolved soon, I plan to take legal
action." (Source. )
Why is it no one, including the over-paid corporate media, is watching Blue Cross and
demanding any accounting for the massive fraud they are now committing.
The only thing they are good at is taking people money. They are providing no
services and no accountability. The customer service is not bad, it's non-existent.
These are serious charges. They show that Blue Cross has committed consumer
fraud and theft many thousand times, over and over, in the last month or two,
ever since ObamaCare went into effect.
Look at the comments on the internet of more disgruntled Blue Cross customers:
1/24/2014 "The worst! Anyway I
have paid my money after fiddling for hours
with the Covered California site that constantly errored. I have never received a card
or welcome kit with policy from Anthem. They seemed to be able to cash my check
promptly though, so they are good at something. Forget about calling them. I have
done it 5 times and the automated attendant says "were to busy to talk to you now.
Call back at another time. Screw these people. They wont get another dime of my money
I can't imagine having a claim with these bozos! Customer Satisfaction. Zero" Source
1/28/2014 "HORRIBLE customer service. Have been on hold with them for a total
of 5 hours now in the past 3 days and still have not spoken with anyone to resolve an issue
that should have never happened in the first place. I don't even have the option to be on
hold anymore because the reps are all busy. Recording says they open at 7am so looks like
I have to set my alarm for that. Am planning on looking for a new provider just because of
this horrible experience. Stay away!" Source
1/13/2014 "Worst Insurance company ever! I've been trying to cancel my plan for
a month now, but there is nobody to talk to... The phones are NEVER answered
(i probably spent a total of 10 hours holding on the phone), their call back system doesn't work
(the system calls me back, but there is nobody on the line), they do not reply to emails, or
letters, or fax... They changed my plan with the new year because of the health care reform,
and the new plan they put me on is more expensive than my previous one, but covers less...
a lot less! and it is not a PPO anymore..."
They don't pay their doctors: .
"Horizon BCBS engages in deceptive practices:
1 I used their web site to determine what doctors were in my network.
2. I saw a doctor listed as being in my network.
3. The doctor sent them the bill.
4. They denied the claim because the doctor was not in my network.
5. I called and they told me the doctor was not in my network--while I was looking at their web screen telling me the doctor was in my network. Liars" (Source. )
"They are by far THE WORSE EXPERIENCE a person could have with health insurance. Customer service is terrible, coverage is terrible, out-of-network benefits are arbitrarily changed and rates are changed with no notice of any kind. The way this company conducts business is in no way helpful to clients and all they ever do is leave you with a headache, your problem unresolved, and bills not covered, which leads to an inability to obtain the services needed from the specialists needed because you are now broke from paying the out-of-network rate, the OFN deductible, and on top of that they only cover 70% of the bill." (Source. )
More of the Same
1/20/2014 Happy Martin Luther King Day.
Martin Luther King, Jr., was the only 35 when he received the Nobel Peace Prize.
He is still the youngest man ever to receiver it. He immediately turned over the
prize money of $54,123 to the American civil rights movement. In April 1968, at the
age of only 29, Doctor King was assassinated in Memphis while supporting striking
black sanitary public works employees. He sought to change the rules such as those
that allowed black street repairmen to receive pay for only two hours when they
were sent home because of bad weather, while white employees were paid for the full day.
By 1967, King understood that fighting racism also meant fighting war, poverty
and materialism. He understood that racism fostered the arrogance of power that
had enmeshed America into its War on Vietnam. He understood that extremes
of wealth and poverty fostered mistrust, violence and still more racism. King
confided to Harry Belefonte, What deeply troubles me now is that for all the steps
weve taken toward integration, Ive come to believe that we are integrating into a
How much good would come from getting Black folks fully integrated into
a power structure that promotes materialism and militarism? What much
would be the good if new well-off Black folks raised their kids to be indifferent
to the suffering of Poor people in America? Because of this, he started
a Poor People's Campaign to bring all the races together!
This the FBI and the Power Structure of the time could not tolerate. The Poor People's
Campaign wanted the federal government to prioritize helping the poor. There
should be a $30 billion anti-poverty package. It would include real commitment
to full employment. The Government would provide Public Works jobs to those
who needed them. There would be a guaranteed annual income. More decent,
low-income housing would be built. King demanded the ending of the war
overseas, 12000 miles away and the launching of a "bloodless war against
racism and poverty".
Hoover, the head of the FBI, considered him to be "under the influence of Communists"
and the FBI worked very actively for ten years to discredit him in many, many ways.
They spied and eavesdropped on him constantly. They spread lies everywhere.
They sought to entice him into extra-marital dalliances. And in this they wasted millions
of dollars of tax payers' money, all with the Presidential support of JFK and LBJ.
Hoover was too powerful and knew too much to be challenged by an American
President. Tomorrow I will listen hard to see if CNN mentions any of this.
No doubt King threatened many in power, for he had the ear of a hundred million
Americans when he started connecting the dots of racism, war, poverty and materialism.
These evils are not only self-perpetuating and mutually inter-linked.. In the case of
materialism, poverty and war, they are still spiraling around and around each other
faster and faster.
I think Dr. King would have understood very well the forces that caused
Congress last month not to vote the extension of unemployment benefits to
7 million long-term unemployed Americans, but were pleased to continue
allow billionaires and corporations to be taxed effectively at a lower rate than
most working people making $25,000 a year. No doubt Dr. King
would have condemned the use of his name in a national holiday if the
government was merely trying to make it seem that "his Dream" was
believed in by those who run America. Had he been allowed to live, he would
be relentlessly demanding an improvement in the living conditions for
the bottom tier in America at the expense of the very rich, instead of the
other way around, as has been the case since his death.
Share of Wealth held by the Top 1% in the
|Top 1 percent|
He would surely ask,
"Why must one seventh of the US population, 47 million people, live in
poverty so that 400 billionaires can have more wealth than half of the
entire population in the US?"
King's Populist Message Scared The Rich and Their Protectors.
"All of the arbitrary power and lawless tactics that had accumulated in the bureau
over the years were marshaled to destroy King's reputation and the movement
he led. The FBI relied on its vague authority to investigate "subversives" to spy
on King and SCLC; its vague authority to conduct warrantless wiretapping and
microphonic surveillance to tap and bug him; its secrecy to conduct covert
operations against him. The campaign began with his rise to leadership and
grew more vicious as he reached the height of his power; it continued even
after his assassination in 1968."
After Dr. King gave his famous "I have a Dream" speech, Americans everywhere listened
and millions applauded. The FBI saw him as the enemy. A memoranda to the director,
characterized his spech as "demagogic". The presence of "200" Communists among
the 250,000 marchers caused the FBI's Intelligence Division to state that it had
underestimated Communist efforts and influence on American Negroes and the
civil rights movement. King was singled out:
"He stands head and shoulders over all other Negro leaders put together
when it comes to influencing great masses of Negroes. We must mark him now . . .
as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this Nation from the standpoint of
Communism the Negro and national security."
Dr. King was awarded numerous honors in 1963. But the Hoover and the FBI
did not change their antagonistic view. They were determined to destroy his reputation
any way they could. See http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/NSA/Vendetta_MLK_LS.html
Did The FBI have a hand in assassinating King?
From what I know personally of them, I think the FBI of that era was certainly stupid
enough to do something like this. They certainly saw that JFK could be assassinated
without anyone getting to the bottom of that plot and they may have decided to
it was very feasible. But who knows? I think the point is that we have a national
police/security/eaves-dropping/intelligence (sic) apparatus that puts itself above
the people everywhere we look. Certainly, Obama has done little to reign them in.
Websites That Suggest The FBI Was Part
of the Conspiracy That Killed Dr King.
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.
11/8/2013 Democrats and Republicans Keep Sending Manufacturing
Jobs Overseas to The Delight of Big Corporations and Wall Street.
If Obama gets his way, NAFTA will be augmented with SHAFTA.
Neither party talks about how international free trade is destroying the American worker.
The Economic Recovery consists mostly of low paying jobs. Manufacturing jobs are
still being sent overseas. The evidence shows that Obama has quietly betrayed all the Union
workers who campaigned for him. The Democrats just love all those campaign contributions
from Wall Street "fat cats" and will do nothing to jeopardaize them. More than 5 million
manufacturing jobs have disappeared since 2000. 2.7 million were lost to China. Lots could
be done, but Obama proposes absolutely nothing! No wonder Wall Street keeps rising
and Main Street USA continues to suffer. Income and Wealth inequality have never been
greater. The numbers are worse now than in 1907 or in 1928 before severe stock market
Decline in U.S. Manufacturing Jobs,
Feb. 2013 to Sept. 2013
All Employees in Manufacturing
10/11/2013 Republicans Finally Denounce Tea Party Extremeism
Up Goes The Stock Market
Who did Speaker Boehner finally listen to? The Koch Brothers, National
Retail Association, National Federation of Inependent Businesses,
US Chamber of Commerce, American Bankers Association and Wall Street.
In unison, all these major sources of Republicans funding have denounced
the Tea Party effort to shut down the government. Only when they all started
yelling at him, did the spineless Boehner agree to end the threat to shut down
the government. Within a day, all sorts of other Republicans themselves then started
to denounc the Tea Party terrorists. Why? Because polls show Republican
approval ratings have now dropped below 25%. Wall Street Journal/NBC gives
Republicans a 24% approval rating.
New 10/9/2013 Tea Party Desperation Is Making
The Tea-Party Ideologes Do Dangerous and Crazy Things.
They know they are fighting Demographic trends. In 10 years
they will be an insignificant minority. And they know they
are alienating more and more of their own people with their
fire-brand extremeism. This may be their last chance.
New 10/8/2013 Tea-Party Terrorists Now Threaten America
Just as Did Many of Their Ancestors in 1860.
Stop Them Now. Do Not Assume They Do Not Mean
What They Say. That Is how The American Civil War Started.
They Are A Minority of racist, hot-head Extortionists, anti-democratic, would-be
Secessionists. Not for nothing are they called "Neo-Confederates". They hate
the 14th Amendment's egalitarianism. They place their "peculiar" version of
"property rights" above "human rights". And also just like the Slave-Owners
who fired on Fort Sumter and started the American Civil War that caused 600,000
young men to die, they saw their world was in rapid economic and political decline,
so they were desperate and did not care who they hurt.
Especially Abraham Lincoln Republicans should call this minority, the
Neo-Confederate faction in the House of Repesentatives exactly what they are.
They are "terrorists". Instead, the commercial media celebrates their "boldness"
and "their spirit of independence". They are lionized and their "books" promoted.
Is this is another attempr at starting a new Civil War, at destroying the American
Federal Government of wrecking the Economy. Just as after the Civil War,
when ex-slave-owners who fought the Union Army, were required to sign
loyalty oaths and not allowed to run for public office, limits should now
be imposed. The 14th Amendment explicitly requires House members
to work to ensure that all US Government debts are paid in full. Instead,
the Tea Party faction threatens to stop the US Government and bring
about "Default" if they do not get their way, this time - that ObamaCare,
the law of the land must be delayed by a year or they will put the US in default
of its debts. This is the Confederate's doctrine of nullification all over again.
Always the Supreme Court has rejected it.
We cannot ignore their threat. It must be exposed and prevented. They are not
men of "good will" who modestly only seek to improve laws. They threaten the
"good faith and credit" of the entire country. It seems they seek to destroy the
US every bit as much as the Slave-Owners in Charleston did in 1861.
They are terrorists who threaten the economic and political security of each
American citizen. They pose a deadly threat to the entire World Economy, too.
Do not the disasters they now threaten us with justify full force
FBI counter-terrorism measures against them if they persist?.
New 10/3/2013 The Tea Party's Dirty Little Secret
"Actually, it was Republican Presidents That Created Most of The National Debt."
Cheney boasted "deficits do not matter". Bush knew if they squandered
the national Treasury, they could always just blame the Democrats
and the Commercial Media would let them get away with the lie.
See Tiger Blog 3/1/2008
"Cheney's Buds Have Robbed The US Treasury Dry."
New 10/2/2013 Meet Mr. GerryMander
John Boehner's House District Is Typical, but Hardly Exceptional.
"It looks like a fire-hydrant with a wrench sticking out". It carefully avoids Dayton and the industrial
Cincinnati-Dayton corridor. The US Senate's composition is bad enough. How much longer can America
survive such flagrantly anti-urban, anti-working class, anti-consumer and anti-democratic government as
the House of Representatives show? Republican desperation lies at the heart of the ridiculous degree of
gerrymandering now of House seats. They are fighting many trends: demographics, urbanization and growing
class consciousness in a country whose middle class is dwindling...
Chronological Listing of Tiger Blogs on
The Real US Political Economy and Stock Market since 2007
Little Children Should Look Away. This Is Not A Pretty Picture.
This is not what they teach you in Civics Class, Social Studies or Sunday School.
Nearly everyone but Obama know that both Dems and Repubs are the puppets
of the big bankers. An extreme statement? The public comments about this
overwhelmingly reflect the same cynicism I feel.
Why Is The Class Divide So Wide?
The theme running through out most of the articles I've written here on
is the growing contrast and contradiction between the bleak economic
situation 100 million Americans ( "Main Street") are now in and the
plush Political Economy of Wall Street. Time Magazine has a timely lead
article this week that put it bluntly, "How Wall Street Won."
What exactly has Wall Street won under Obama? For starters, nearly all the income gains
since 2008 have gone to Wall Street and the highest corporate officials. These huge gains
did not go to Wall Street because they were smarter or more deserving. Hell, they
caused the ECONOMIC CRASH! They were given to them by public policy makers.
Here's my short list of the public policies since 2008 that made this possible.
Robert Reich has an appropriate essay: "Why The Idea of 'Free Market' Is Total BS."
Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi's take on this is well worth reading, too.
The forces that have made this divide so wide are well-entrenched and
growing each the day. It was not always like this. Now the Super-rich
are parasites. They are consumed by Greed. They are Traitors. They
eagerly create jobs overseas. They pauperize Americans and then
they accuse workers who want more balance in society of waging
a "class war". But they, these same super-rich, accuse the poor who
work hard at two or three jobs of being "parasites" when they get food
stamps to feed their family because they are paid so little in their non-union,
non-benefit jobs. Congress is "the best that Big Money can buy". So is
the Presidency. So is the supine Supreme Court. So is the monopolized
mass media. "Where is a poor boy to turn?"- that's a very good question.
Once the stock market was a barometer of the national economy, Under
FDR, the rising stock market also meant the restoration of hope for a national
economic recovery for all Americans. Under Eisenhower, there was full employment,
decent wages, fair taxation and a rising stock market, too.
Things have markedly changed for the worse. Now the stock market
measures the degree of control that the super wealthy have over all of America.
But, it was not always - I emphasize - like this. Once a rising stock market
offered hope to millions and millions of Americans.
A Rising Stock Market Once Meant Good Times for All Americans
The "I Like IKE" Years Remembered.
(The next Blog)
Would Eisenhower be a Republican now? After the Korean War, from
1953 to 1960 the stock market boomed. But so did the middle class of America.
There were construction jobs aplenty. There were manufacturing jobs
for anyone. There were good unions who protected workers and made
sure the productivity gains were widely distributed. Taxes on the super
wealth's income was as high as 91% for income amounts over a million.
The government was not a "barren whore" as libertarians say, it built the
massive interstate highway system we use today. And still the stock
September 14, 1953 255.5
January 1, 1954 280.4
January 1, 1955 488.4
January 1, 1956 499.5
January 1, 1957 435.7 (Sputnik scare)
January 1, 1958 583.7
January 1, 1959 679.3 +128% rise in the DJI.
People have asked me to write a Daily Blog. They wanted
me to give them a thought or two each few day. About what?
They let me decide. As, I see it, a blog is a personal statement.
I will try to make it entertaining and relate it mostly to the
stock market and insider trading. As we look at the forces that
effect stock prices, we are immediately drawn into
"political economy", the study of choices governments make
based, upon their biases and the pressures brought to bear
on them. Many of these choices are very one-sided and
hurtful to the people I grew up with in the MidWest. Many
are highly offensive to my sense of compassion and honesty.
There are no "sacred cows" here. I do promise to try not to
belabor the obvious.
So, I hope these thoughts, reflections and finds are worth your time.
I will give you my best. In return, I ask that you ask me
first before you publish on the internet or elsewhere what
I offer here. Email me at email@example.com
About me and my 31 years's work, TigerSoft
The Real US Political Economy vs Wall Street's Stock Market
- American Income and Wealth Inequality are now much worse than in 1928.
- The wholesale exporting of US manufacturing jobs amounts to treason and should be considered criminal.
- Neither political party recognizes, much less has solutions to reverse, the decline in good paying manufacturing jobs.
- To blame the poor who are the victims of this failing economic and political system is hypocritical, arrogant and ignorant.
- The US Government wastes trillions on tragically misguided foreign wars and bases that should be used here at home..
- Sadly, Wall Street has been the best place to make a lot of money. Yet it produces little and causes these perverted priorities.
- The lack of regulation of Wall Street will surely produce another Bubble and Crash. So be prepared. Use TigerSoft.
Our Tiger Software will help you survive and thrive in this Wall Street dominated Economy.
Peerless Stock Market Timing: 1915-2013
TigerSoft Insider Trading Stock Charts
Tiger Power Ranker
William Schmidt's Nightly on-Line Hotline.
See www.tigersoft.com Contact firstname.lastname@example.org 858-273-5900 About Us
NEW 9/8/2013 Financial Parasitism:
>>> It Is Not Accidental that Wall Street Is Booming
while Main Street Is in Survival Mode.
HOW CAN THE STOCK MARKET KEEP RISING
WHILE MAIN STREET AMERICA IS IN DECLINE?
>>> Obama as Puppet of Wall Street
Populist Rhetoric notwithstanding,
Obama Does What Wall Street Tells Him To Do.
Despite all his populist rhetoric, for 4 1/2 years Obama and the FED have given
Wall Street nearly everything it wanted and wants. In return, Wall Street has
agreed to use its powerful computerized program trading tools to pump the
market up and limit the short selling they used in 2008 to drive the stock
market. The low trading volume shows this. Program trading by firms like
Goldman, JPMorgan and Bank of America (through Merrill Lynch) push prices
up and up.
Because the public is absolutely traumatized, mistrustful and dangerously
pauperized, they have mostly avoided the stock market until 2013, just in
time for what may be a market top after rising 55 months!
The public and some institutions have have not appreciated the power of computerized
Wall Street manipulation of prices upward backed up by Fed guarantees that
interest rates will stay low. These Wall Street big bank traders are safely
backstopped AND also bankrolled by the U.S. FED. And Obama does not challenge them.
There is no Administrative drive to limit the power of the Big Banks, to break
them up, to tax their computerized trading or their millions and millions in
President Obama has recklessly and cynically gambled that a rising stock
market will eventually inflate the wealthy's bank accounts so much
that they will start spending their profits and that will boost business
and job creation. Because so much money goes into hyper-specualtion
and goes overseas, Obama's trickle-down gamble is not paying off. The
new jobs in the US are not good-paying manufacturing jobs. they are
mostly very low paying, non-union services jobs in places like Walmart
and in fast-food restaurants. Without good jobs, 100 million Americans
are poor consumers. Without a big consumer base, corporations have
one more reason to invest overseas. There is no loyalty on Wall Street
or among most big corporations to America. At the same time, the Wall
Street bubble of speculation and over-production will eventually crash
the stock market.
Tiger Blogs on this subject:
Professionals Now Rig Stock Prices Upwards with Extra Fed Help
April 9, 2010 The Power Elite's Biggest Gamble of All. They Cannot Afford to Lose.
That's Why The Market Looks Like It Will Keep Rallying.
April 4, 2010 Why The Stock Market Keeps Rallying:
The Secret Deal Obama, The Fed and Wall Street Have Reached.
April 9, 2009 Goldman Sachs Is "The GREED CONNECTION" between Wall Street and
April 25, 2009 Massive Federal Reserve Fraud and Corruption Story Breaking..
Bernanke Covers Up Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in Losses
from Bad Loans The Fed Made To Banks Using Toxic Collateral.
March 23, 2009 Monopoly Finance Obama Obama's Biggest Wall Street Contributors Fleeced
Shareholders on The Way Down And Now Will Fleece Taxpayers on The Way Up.
March 25, 2009 Why Is The Stock Market Rallying? Wall Street Now Sees That Obama's
Populist Rhetoric Is Designed To Fool The Angry Public Obama Is Signaling Wall Street
He Will Protect Them
WALL STREET'S PLAYING FIELD
The stock market is where the rich make their money. Make some yourself.
But first learn how to watch the insiders from TigerSoft. It's not so difiicult.
See how easy it is to spot the difference between stocks likely to rise from those
about to fall.
Tiger two proprietary internal strength indicators show you this.
1) The Tiger Accumulation Index lets you see what insiders
are doing in any given stock. Buy what they buy. Sell what they sell.
2) The Tiger Closing Power shows you whether Wall Street
Professionals are new buyers or sellers. Trade with them!
Examples: Both of the charts below were from 7/19/2013. Both were recommended
on our nightly Hotline, one as a buy and one as a short sale.
You can readily spot the stocks Insiders are heavily buying and heavily selling
just like we do. Each day contrast the best, like AFPC with the worst,
like SQM . The results are often amazing. Just as there are two
economies, there are two Wall Streets.
7/19* 7/31 8/19 9/4
APFC 33.74 36.37 44.18 50.93
SQM 38.2 28.96 27.03 26.96
Bullish Looking Stock - AFPC
Bearish Looking SQM - Short the Confirmed Breakdowns
The stock market is still the best
place to supplement your iincome
and to build a retirement fund. But you really must learn how to navigate
through its pitfalls and traps for average investors. We can help you a lot.
FOR SAFER, MORE PROFITABLE STOCK MARKET
INVESTING AND TRADING, TURN TO TIGERSOFT.
We've been serving investors large and small since 1981.
Insider Trading in Stocks is Rampant:
TigerSoft Insider Trading Stock, Commodity and Currency Charts.
Use TigerSoft Insider Trading Charts to Level The Play FIeld,
Peerless Stock Market Timing:
Learn Peerless and know more than the most Insiders do.
31 Years of Automatic Peerless General Market Buys and Sells applied to SP-500 Stocks
Back to Home Page - www.tigersoft.com
Peerless Stock Market Timing: 1915-2008,
TigerSoft Insider Watch Software
and TigerSoft Automatic Buys And Sells.
Insider Trading in Stocks Is Rampant,
How TigerSoft Spots Key Unofficial Insider and Professionals' Trading
Become An Insider Trading Bounty Hunter
Make Big Money!
Use TigerSoft Insider Trading Charts to Level The Play FIeld,
Daily Trading Oppprtunities Using TigerSoft
The Trading Opportunities in The New Merger Mania
TigerSoft's Measures of Insider and Professional Buying
have been Bullish since March 2009.
Our understanding of American Political Economy has exactly matched and explained
the Stock Market's Bullishness since March 2009. Our Peerless Stock Marker Timing: 1915-2011
has caused us to be very bullish since March 2009, while many others held back and called for
another market collapse. They needed to :
1) Use Peerless and see the many buy signals since March 2009,
2) Watch Tiger's Professional and Insider Buy Indicators which have all been very bullish,
3) Understand the reality of American Plutocracy now.
DJIA and Peerless Buy and Sells 2009